8.6 Million Traffic Stops · 18 States

Same Stop.
Different Outcome.

Black and Hispanic drivers are searched at up to

0.0×

the rate of White drivers — yet contraband is found less often

Black: 2.4×Hispanic: 2.3×
8.6Mstops analyzed
18states
2000–2020time span
Since you opened this page, approximately 0 traffic stops would have occurred in these states.

The Smoking Gun: Hit Rates

The “outcome test” is powerful evidence: if police search Black and Hispanic drivers more often but find contraband less often, the excess searches can't be justified by higher criminality. It suggests a lower bar for searching minority drivers.

Search Rate (%)

Hit Rate (% searches finding contraband)

Key Insight

In every state analyzed, both Black and Hispanic drivers are searched at significantly higher rates than White drivers — and in many states, Hispanic drivers face the highest search rates of any group. Yet contraband is found at equal or lower rates for both groups compared to White drivers. This pattern is strong evidence of racial bias in search decisions.

Same Violation. Different Outcome.

Same car. Same speed. Same road. The only difference? The driver's race. See how outcomes diverge for the exact same stop.

White Driver

Citation52.4%
Warning32.4%
Arrested15.2%

Black Driver

Citation57.4%
Warning23.3%
Arrested19.3%

Hispanic Driver

Citation61.1%
Warning22.5%
Arrested16.4%

In Arizona, a Black driver is 1.3× more likely to be arrested during a traffic stop than a White driver.

The National Picture

Racial disparities in traffic stops aren't limited to a few bad departments. They're everywhere. Hover over a state to see its data.

WM5.1×NDMMNYV4.6×NHM1.8×OIWSDIowaW3.9×Ohio2.7×C2.6×RI2.2×NC2.8×N1.9×M1.7×I1.9×INJ1.2×M1.2×C1.9×A2.3×NMKTVNC2.0×SC1.3×TOAMGF2.3×LA
No data <1.3× 1.3–1.7× 1.7–2.0× 2.0–2.5× >2.5×Black/White search rate ratio

State by State

Each state tells its own story. Explore the data behind the disparities.

Arizona

2009-05-282017-12-31

500K
Total Stops
2.3×
B/W Search Ratio
500K
Sample Size
white
4.2%
black
9.76%
hispanic
8.73%
asian/pacific islander
2.82%

California

2009-07-012016-06-30

500K
Total Stops
1.9×
B/W Search Ratio
500K
Sample Size
white
2.51%
black
4.66%
hispanic
4.89%
asian/pacific islander
1.91%

Colorado

2010-01-012017-12-31

500K
Total Stops
2.8×
B/W Search Ratio
500K
Sample Size
white
0.32%
black
0.9%
hispanic
0.79%
asian/pacific islander
0.27%

Connecticut

2013-10-012015-10-01

500K
Total Stops
2.6×
B/W Search Ratio
500K
Sample Size
white
2.83%
black
7.26%
hispanic
6.79%
asian/pacific islander
1.82%

Florida

2010-01-122018-12-31

500K
Total Stops
2.3×
B/W Search Ratio
500K
Sample Size
white
0.43%
black
0.98%
hispanic
0.57%
asian/pacific islander
0.32%

Illinois

2012-01-012017-12-31

500K
Total Stops
1.9×
B/W Search Ratio
500K
Sample Size
white
3.6%
black
6.89%
hispanic
6.29%
asian/pacific islander
1.62%

Maryland

2007-01-012014-03-31

500K
Total Stops
1.2×
B/W Search Ratio
500K
Sample Size
white
2.61%
black
3.22%
hispanic
4.04%
asian/pacific islander
1.4%

Massachusetts

2007-01-012015-12-31

500K
Total Stops
1.8×
B/W Search Ratio
500K
Sample Size
white
1.34%
black
2.4%
hispanic
3.2%
asian/pacific islander
0.83%

Missouri

2010-01-012015-01-01

500K
Total Stops
1.7×
B/W Search Ratio
500K
Sample Size
white
5.78%
black
10%
hispanic
10.45%
asian/pacific islander
3.32%

Montana

2009-01-012017-12-31

500K
Total Stops
5.1×
B/W Search Ratio
500K
Sample Size
white
0.3%
black
1.52%
hispanic
1.24%
asian/pacific islander
0.52%

Nebraska

2002-01-012016-10-01

500K
Total Stops
1.9×
B/W Search Ratio
500K
Sample Size
white
2.36%
black
4.45%
hispanic
5.61%
asian/pacific islander
1.81%

New Jersey

2009-01-012016-12-31

500K
Total Stops
1.2×
B/W Search Ratio
500K
Sample Size
white
67.7%
black
79.67%
hispanic
73.26%
asian/pacific islander
60%

North Carolina

2000-01-012015-12-31

500K
Total Stops
2.0×
B/W Search Ratio
500K
Sample Size
white
2.25%
black
4.43%
hispanic
4.69%
asian/pacific islander
1.79%

Ohio

2010-01-012017-12-31

457K
Total Stops
2.7×
B/W Search Ratio
457K
Sample Size
white
2.64%
black
7.02%
hispanic
6.33%
asian/pacific islander
1.59%

Rhode Island

2005-01-022015-12-31

471K
Total Stops
2.2×
B/W Search Ratio
471K
Sample Size
white
2.9%
black
6.29%
hispanic
6%
asian/pacific islander
2.21%

South Carolina

2005-01-012016-12-27

500K
Total Stops
1.3×
B/W Search Ratio
500K
Sample Size
white
2.35%
black
3.02%
hispanic
8.15%

Vermont

2010-07-012015-12-31

279K
Total Stops
4.6×
B/W Search Ratio
279K
Sample Size
white
1.03%
black
4.76%
hispanic
3.77%
asian/pacific islander
0.75%

Wisconsin

2010-01-012016-05-16

427K
Total Stops
3.9×
B/W Search Ratio
427K
Sample Size
white
1.26%
black
4.87%
hispanic
3.03%
asian/pacific islander
0.97%

Trends Over Time

Are things getting better? Track how search rates have changed year by year.

Know Your Rights

Knowledge is protection. Here's what every driver should know when pulled over.

🤐

Right to Remain Silent

You must provide your license, registration, and insurance. Beyond that, you have the right to remain silent. You can say: "I choose to remain silent."

🚫

Right to Refuse a Search

If an officer asks to search your car, you can refuse. Say clearly: "I do not consent to a search." They may search anyway if they have probable cause, but your refusal protects you legally.

📱

Right to Record

You have the right to record police interactions in all 50 states. Keep your phone visible and don't interfere with the officer's duties.

🚗

Stay Calm, Stay Safe

Keep your hands visible. Don't reach for anything until asked. Turn on your interior light at night. Your safety comes first — assert your rights calmly.

📝

Document Everything

Note the officer's name, badge number, patrol car number, and agency. Write down what happened as soon as possible. File a complaint if your rights were violated.

⚖️

Right to a Lawyer

If arrested, say: "I want to speak to a lawyer." Do not sign anything or make decisions without legal counsel.

Take Action

Data alone doesn't create change. Share this evidence, contact your representatives, and support organizations fighting for reform.

Follow the Investigation

New data, updates, and analysis from Justice Index.

Contact Your Senator

Find Your Senator →

About This Project

Data Source

This project uses data from the Stanford Open Policing Project, which collected and standardized over 200 million traffic stop records from across the United States.

Citation

E. Pierson, C. Simoiu, J. Overgoor, S. Corbett-Davies, D. Jenson, A. Shoemaker, V. Ramachandran, P. Barghouty, C. Phillips, R. Shroff, and S. Goel. “A large-scale analysis of racial disparities in police stops across the United States.” Nature Human Behaviour, Vol. 4, 2020.

Methodology

We analyze search rates, hit rates (the “outcome test”), and yearly trends across 17 states with the most complete data, from coast to coast. Search rates measure how often stopped drivers are searched. Hit rates measure how often those searches find contraband. The outcome test — if a group is searched more but contraband is found less often — provides evidence of bias.

Regression Analysis

We run logistic regressions for each state to control for confounding variables. The search model predicts whether a stopped driver is searched, controlling for age, sex, year, stop type, and violation category — with race as the key independent variable (white drivers as reference). We report odds ratios: a value of 2.0× means that group is twice as likely to be searched after accounting for all other factors. The arrest model uses the same controls to predict arrest. The hit rate model tests the “outcome test” — among searched drivers only, whether contraband is found at different rates by race. Lower hit rates for groups searched more frequently suggests the higher search rate is not justified by contraband discovery.

Models use up to 100,000 observations per state (randomly sampled where datasets are larger). Confidence intervals are 95%. Statistical significance is indicated by ★ markers (★★★ = p < 0.001).

Limitations

  • 18 of 33 available states had sufficiently complete search data
  • Data spans different time periods per state (2000–2018)
  • Some states lack hit rate data (Florida)
  • Observational data cannot prove causation, but patterns are consistent
  • Definitions of “search” vary slightly across jurisdictions

Justice Index · Three Investigations

Bias doesn't stop at traffic stops. It follows people from the street to the courtroom to the bank.